Logica Universalis 14 (2):151-174 (2020)

Authors
Pavel Arazim
Charles University, Prague (PhD)
Abstract
Logical pluralism as a thesis that more than one logic is correct seems very plausible for two basic reasons. First, there are so many logical systems on the market today. And it is unclear how we should decide which of them gets the logical rules right. On the other hand, logical monism as the opposite thesis still seems plausible, as well, because of normativity of logic. An approach which would manage to bring a synthesis of both logical pluralism and logical monism is called for. I review the possible forms of logical pluralism and render them more plausible. I thus arrive at logical dynamism, a synthesis of various pluralisms and monism focused on how logic develops.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Change in View.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Behaviorism 16 (1):93-96.
Articulating Reasons.Robert B. Brandom - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (1):121-127.
Wittgenstein on rules and private language.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):496-499.
What Are Logical Notions?John Corcoran & Alfred Tarski - 1986 - History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (2):143-154.
Pluralism in Logic.Hartry Field - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (2):342-359.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pluralismo, Monismo e Relativismo Lógico.Diogo Dias - 2018 - Revista de Filosofia Moderna E Contemporânea 6 (2):21-36.
Limiting Logical Pluralism.Suki Finn - forthcoming - Synthese:1-19.
Logical Pluralism and Semantic Information.Patrick Allo - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):659 - 694.
Making Sense of Logical Pluralism.Matti Eklund - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (3-4):433-454.
Logical Pluralism, Indeterminacy and the Normativity of Logic.Filippo Ferrari & Sebastiano Moruzzi - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-24.
Logical Pluralism, Indeterminacy and the Normativity of Logic.Sebastiano Moruzzi & Filippo Ferrari - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (3-4):323-346.
The Normative Problem for Logical Pluralism.Nathan Kellen - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (3-4):258-281.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-14

Total views
12 ( #715,418 of 2,326,030 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #50,971 of 2,326,030 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes