Classes or Individuals? The Paradox of Systematics Revisited

The circumscription of taxa and classification of organisms are fundamental tasks in the systematization of biological diversity. Their success depends on a unified idea concerning the species concept, evolution, and taxonomy; paradoxically, however, it requires a complete distinction between taxa and evolutionary units. To justify this view, I discuss these three topics of systematics. Species concepts are examined, and I propose a redefinition for the Taxonomic Species Concept based on nomenclatural properties, in which species are classes conventionally represented by a binomial. Speciation is subsequently discussed, to demonstrate that concepts on the evolutionary process are damaged when species are considered as evolutionary units. Speciation should be considered a transition among patterns of a population and, consequently, always a sympatric process. This view contrasts with the majority of speciation models, which analyze cladogeneses and classify speciation geographically, usually considering allopatry the essential condition for the differentiation process. Finally, taxonomy is considered, to show that the equivalence between evolutionary and taxonomic units may also damage the practice of biological systematization. Principles and rules of nomenclature and classification should offer freedom to accommodate divergent opinions about systematics and to incorporate the evolution of knowledge; therefore, they should remain independent of biological theories
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.09.006
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,220
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Species.Philip Kitcher - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):308-333.
Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism.Elliott Sober - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (3):350-383.
Are Species Really Individuals?David Hull - 1976 - Systematic Zoology 25:174-91.
Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis.Joel Cracraft - 1983 - In R. F. Johnston (ed.), Current Ornithology. Plenum Press. pp. 159-87.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sets and Classes as Many.John L. Bell - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (6):585-601.
Russell's Paradox.Kevin C. Klement - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Russell-Myhill Paradox.Kevin C. Klement - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Putnam's Paradox: Metaphysical Realism Revamped and Evaded.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1997 - Philosophical Perspectives 11 (s11):17-42.
Causes, Kinds and Forms.Gerry Webster - 1993 - Acta Biotheoretica 41 (4):275-287.
The Paradox of Self-Consciousness Revisited.P. Robbins - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4):424-443.
Systematics and the Darwinian Revolution.Kevin De Queiroz - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):238-259.
The Preface Paradox Revisited.Igor Douven - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (3):389 - 420.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

74 ( #70,474 of 2,164,828 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #188,443 of 2,164,828 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums