Celebrity, Democracy, and Epistemic Power

Perspectives on Politics 18 (1):27 - 42 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What, if anything, is problematic about the involvement of celebrities in democratic politics? While a number of theorists have criticized celebrity involvement in politics (Meyer 2002; Mills 1957; Postman 1987) none so far have examined this issue using the tools of social epistemology, the study of the effects of social interactions, practices and institutions on knowledge and belief acquisition. This paper will draw on these resources to investigate the issue of celebrity involvement in politics, specifically as this involvement relates to democratic theory and its implications for democratic practice. We will argue that an important and underexplored form of power, which we will call epistemic power, can explain one important way in which celebrity involvement in politics is problematic. This is because unchecked uses and unwarranted allocations of epistemic power, which celebrities tend to enjoy, threaten the legitimacy of existing democracies and raise important questions regarding core commitments of deliberative, epistemic, and plebiscitary models of democratic theory. We will finish by suggesting directions that democratic theorists could pursue when attempting to address some of these problems.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democratic legitimacy and proceduralist social epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Disagreement and epistemic arguments for democracy.Sean Ingham - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):136-155.
The Epistemology of Democracy and the Market: Rejoinder to Elliott.Samuel DeCanio - 2024 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 36 (1-2):183-197.
Public Opinion, Democratic Legitimacy, and Epistemic Compromise.Dustin Olson - 2021 - In Péter Hartl & Adam Tamas Tuboly, Science, Freedom, Democracy. New York, Egyesült Államok: Routledge. pp. 158 - 177.
Repressed Democracy: Legitimacy Problems in World Society.Regina Kreide - 2012 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Política 1 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-11

Downloads
1,318 (#14,987)

6 months
246 (#13,003)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Alfred Archer
Tilburg University
Amanda Cawston
Tilburg University
Benjamin Matheson
University of Bern

Citations of this work

Epistemic Injustice and the Attention Economy.Leonie Smith & Alfred Archer - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (5):777-795.
Ethics of Parasocial Relationships.Alfred Archer & Catherine Robb - forthcoming - In Monika Betzler & Jörg Löschke, The Ethics of Relationships: Broadening the Scope. Oxford University Press.
Public engagement and argumentation in science.Silvia Ivani & Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (3):1-29.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references