Perspectives on Politics 18 (1):27 - 42 (2020)

Authors
Benjamin Matheson
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
Alfred Archer
Tilburg University
Amanda Cawston
Tilburg University
Abstract
What, if anything, is problematic about the involvement of celebrities in democratic politics? While a number of theorists have criticized celebrity involvement in politics (Meyer 2002; Mills 1957; Postman 1987) none so far have examined this issue using the tools of social epistemology, the study of the effects of social interactions, practices and institutions on knowledge and belief acquisition. This paper will draw on these resources to investigate the issue of celebrity involvement in politics, specifically as this involvement relates to democratic theory and its implications for democratic practice. We will argue that an important and underexplored form of power, which we will call epistemic power, can explain one important way in which celebrity involvement in politics is problematic. This is because unchecked uses and unwarranted allocations of epistemic power, which celebrities tend to enjoy, threaten the legitimacy of existing democracies and raise important questions regarding core commitments of deliberative, epistemic, and plebiscitary models of democratic theory. We will finish by suggesting directions that democratic theorists could pursue when attempting to address some of these problems.
Keywords epistemic democracy  democratic theory  celebrity politics  social epistemology  epistemic power  political theory  political epistemology  ethics of fame
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Epistemic Injustice and the Attention Economy.Leonie Smith & Alfred Archer - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (5):777-795.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Pure Epistemic Proceduralism.Fabienne Peter - 2008 - Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 5 (1):33-55.
The Politics of Getting It Right.Russell Muirhead - 2014 - Critical Review 26 (1-2):115-128.
The Epistemic Circumstances of Democracy.Fabienne Peter - 2016 - In Miranda Fricker Michael Brady (ed.), The Epistemic Life of Groups. pp. 133 - 149.
Repressed Democracy: Legitimacy Problems in World Society.Regina Kreide - 2012 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Política 1 (1).
Political Realism and Epistemic Democracy: An International Perspective.Zhichao Tong - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 19 (2):184-205.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-07-11

Total views
187 ( #49,922 of 2,404,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #26,582 of 2,404,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes