Philosophia 41 (2):447-462 (2013)

Authors
Alfred Archer
Tilburg University
Abstract
It has been claimed, by David Heyd, that in order for an act to count as supererogatory the agent performing the act must possess altruistic intentions (1982 p.115). This requirement, Heyd claims, allows us to make sense of the meritorious nature of acts of supererogation. In this paper I will investigate whether there is good reason to accept that this requirement is a necessary condition of supererogation. I will argue that such a reason can be found in cases where two people act in the same way but with only the person who acted with altruistic intent counting as having performed an act of supererogation. In such cases Heyd’s intention requirement plays an important role in ruling out acts that intuitively are not supererogatory. Despite this, I will argue that we should reject Heyd’s requirement and replace it with a moral intention requirement. I will then investigate how to formulate this requirement and respond to two objections that might be raised against it
Keywords Supererogation  Normative Ethics  Motivation  Intention
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-013-9422-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785/2002 - Oxford University Press.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Harvard University Press.
Utilitarianism.J. S. Mill - 1861 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Supererogation, Sacrifice, and the Limits of Duty.Alfred Archer - 2016 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 54 (3):333-354.
Supererogation, Optionality and Cost.Claire Benn - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (10):2399-2417.
Supererogation.Alfred Archer - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (3).

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Supererogation: Its Status in Ethical Theory.David Heyd - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Supererogation for Utilitarianism.Jean-Paul Vessel - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):299 - 319.
Is It Bad to Omit an Act of Supererogation?Gregory Mellema - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:405-416.
God’s Moral Goodness and Supererogation.Elizabeth Drummond Young - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):83-95.
Weakness of Will as Intention-Violation.Dylan Dodd - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):45-59.
Self-Regarding Supererogatory Actions.Jason Kawall - 2003 - Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (3):487–498.
Is Government Supererogation Possible?Justin Weinberg - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):263-281.
Virtue Theory, Ideal Observers, and the Supererogatory.Jason Kawall - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 146 (2):179-96.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-13

Total views
585 ( #11,968 of 2,449,128 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #52,836 of 2,449,128 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes