Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):132-142 (2012)
Much is said about the decline of the family, often in connection with the prevalence of certain social problems. In this article I consider two kinds of fear: (i) that the traditional family is disappearing; (ii) that new forms of family emerging are, in some or other respect, not worthy of the title. In themselves, neither fear, I argue, should give rise to pressing ethical concerns as such. On fear (i): if by ?traditional family? we mean one whose adult members are heterosexuals, normally married and bringing up, in a single shared residence, their own offspring to whom they are biologically related, then indeed this is threatened by certain laws, and social and biotechnological relationships that tolerate and make possible new kinds of parental relationships. But as there are clear ethical objections to the disadvantaging of non-traditional families, there is no clear-cut case that the decline of the traditional version is a bad thing. Fear (ii) typically reflects a concern about excessive separation of the social and biological aspects of parenthood?i.e., that the definition and function of the family in social terms has become detached from a strict biological understanding of such factors. I argue that this concern is misplaced, for various reasons. As a result, there is no good reason to worry that the family?in all of its myriad forms?does not have a future
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Minimal Marriage: What Political Liberalism Implies for Marriage Law.Elizabeth Brake - 2010 - Ethics 120 (2):302-337.
Is the Family to Be Abolished Then?Véronique Munoz-Dardé - 1999 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):37–56.
The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage.Ralph Wedgwood - 1999 - Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (3):225–242.
Reviews The Family: A Liberal Defence. By David Archard. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, Pp. Xxi + 131pages. ISBN- 13:978-0-230-58059-6 Hb. [REVIEW]Brenda Almond - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (3):464-467.
Artificial Gametes: New Paths to Parenthood?A. J. Newson - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):184-186.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Family and Neoliberalism: Time to Revive a Critique.Bob Brecher - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):157-167.
Building Social and Economic Capital: The Family and Medical Savings Accounts.M. J. Cherry - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (6):526-544.
The Moral Challenge of Natality: Towards a Post-Traditional Concept of Family and Privacy in Reprogenetics.Claudia Wiesemann - 2010 - The New Genetics and Society 29:61-71.
Theories of Family in Ancient Chinese Philosophy.Zailin Zhang - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):343-359.
The Patient in the Family and the Family in the Patient.Barry Hoffmaster & Wayne Weston - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Feminist Challenges to the New Familialism: Lifestyle Experimentation and the Freedom of Intimate Association.Karen Struening - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (1):135 - 154.
Making the Family Functional: The Case for Legalized Same-Sex Domestic Partnerships.Larry A. Hickman - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):231-247.
Emerging Trends in Global Ethics: A Comparative Study of U.S. And International Family Business Values. [REVIEW]Mark S. Blodgett, Colette Dumas & Alberto Zanzi - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 99 (S1):29-38.
Added to index2012-05-30
Total downloads62 ( #83,979 of 2,163,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #129,223 of 2,163,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?