Authors
Julie Jebeile
University of Bern
Abstract
In philosophical studies regarding mathematical models of dynamical systems, instability due to sensitive dependence on initial conditions, on the one side, and instability due to sensitive dependence on model structure, on the other, have by now been extensively discussed. Yet there is a third kind of instability, which by contrast has thus far been rather overlooked, that is also a challenge for model predictions about dynamical systems. This is the numerical instability due to the employment of numerical methods involving a discretization process, where discretization is required to solve the differential equations of dynamical systems on a computer. We argue that the criteria for numerical stability, as usually provided by numerical analysis textbooks, are insufficient, and, after mentioning the promising development of backward analysis, we discuss to what extent, in practice, numerical instability can be controlled or avoided.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13194-021-00372-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,464
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy and Climate Science.Eric Winsberg - 2018 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
What Are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability?Charlotte Werndl - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):195-220.
Explaining Chaos.Peter Smith - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Presumed Superiority of Analytical Solutions Over Numerical Methods.Vincent Ardourel & Julie Jebeile - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (2):201-220.
Stability in Cosmology, From Einstein to Inflation.C. D. McCoy - 2020 - In Claus Beisbart, Tilman Sauer & Christian Wüthrich (eds.), Thinking About Space and Time. Cham: Birkhäuser. pp. 71-89.
For a Topology of Dynamical Systems.Claudio Mazzola & Marco Giunti - 2016 - In Gianfranco Minati, Mario Abram & Eliano Pessa (eds.), Towards a Post-Bertalanffy Systemics. Springer. pp. 81-87.
On Entropy of Quantum Compound Systems.Noboru Watanabe - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (10):1311-1329.
Chaos and Algorithmic Complexity.Robert W. Batterman & Homer White - 1996 - Foundations of Physics 26 (3):307-336.
Note on Entropies of Quantum Dynamical Systems.Noboru Watanabe - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (3):549-563.
Today's Dynamical Systems Are Too Simple.Herbert Jaeger - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):643-644.
Dynamical Causes.Russell Meyer - 2020 - Biology and Philosophy 35 (5):1-21.
The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):615-28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-13

Total views
12 ( #813,169 of 2,520,774 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #166,892 of 2,520,774 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes