Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (2):169-199 (2020)

ABSTRACTThis article studies multi-stakeholder initiatives as spaces for both deliberation and contestation between constituencies with competing discourses and disputed values, beliefs, and preferences. We review different theoretical perspectives on MSIs, which see them mainly as spaces to find solutions to market problems, as spaces of conflict and bargaining, or as spaces of consensus. In contrast, we build on a contestatory deliberative perspective, which gives equal value to both contestation and consensus. We identify four types of internal contestation which can be present in MSIs—procedural, inclusiveness, epistemic, and ultimate-goal—and argue that embracing contestation and engaging in ongoing revision of provisional agreements, criteria, and goals can enhance the democratic quality of MSIs. Finally, we explore the implications of this perspective for theorizing about the democratic quality in MSIs and about the role of corporations in transnational governance.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/beq.2019.29
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,287
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Contestation and Deliberation Within.Joshua W. Houston - 2009 - Social Philosophy Today 25:241-253.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,093,323 of 2,325,532 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #170,190 of 2,325,532 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes