Why FDE might be too strong for Beall

Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-16 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his “The simple argument for subclassical logic,” Jc Beall advances an argument that led him to take FDE as the one true logic (the latter point is explicitly made clear in his “FDE as the One True Logic”). The aim of this article is to point out that if we follow Beall’s line of reasoning for endorsing FDE, there are at least two additional reasons to consider that FDE is too strong for Beall’s purposes. In fact, we claim that Beall should consider another weaker subclassical logic as the logic adequate for his project. To this end, we first briefly present Beall’s argument for FDE. Then, we discuss two specific topics that seem to motivate us to weaken FDE. We then introduce a subsystem that will enjoy all the benefits of Beall’s suggestion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Shrieking, Shrugging, and the Australian Plan.Hitoshi Omori & Michael De - 2022 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 63 (2).
Carnap as a Beall-style logical monist.Teresa Kouri Kissel - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):1-16.
There is no Logical Negation: True, False, Both, and Neither.Jc Beall - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Logic 14 (1):Article no. 1.
True and false–as if. Ch. 12 of G. Priest, Jc Beall and B. Armour-Garb.Jc Beall - 2004 - In Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction : New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
de Camp, L. S., The Bronze God of Rhodes. [REVIEW]Beall Beall - 1959 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 53:232.
Review of: Jc Beall, "The Contradictory Christ". [REVIEW]Timothy Pawl - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (2).
Beall-ing O.Jeremiah Joven Joaquin - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
The simple argument for subclassical logic.Jc Beall - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):30-54.
On the pluralistic conception of logic.Zoltán Vecsey - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (1):1-16.
What Topic for off-topic in WK3?Massimiliano Carrara, Filippo Mancini & Wei Zhu - 2022 - In Pavel Materna & Bjørn Jespersen (eds.), Logically Speaking. A Festschrift for Marie Duží. College Publications. pp. 113-128.
A Reinterpretation of Beall’s ‘Off-Topic’ Semantics.Jeremiah Joven B. Joaquin - 2022 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 31 (3):409-421.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-27

Downloads
9 (#1,098,658)

6 months
9 (#158,930)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jonas R. B. Arenhart
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Negation on the Australian Plan.Francesco Berto & Greg Restall - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (6):1119-1144.
Angellic Content.Kit Fine - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (2):199-226.
A useful four-valued logic.N. D. Belnap - 1977 - In J. M. Dunn & G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. D. Reidel.
Doubt Truth to Be a Liar.Graham Priest - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):541-544.
A Modality Called ‘Negation’.Francesco Berto - 2015 - Mind 124 (495):761-793.

View all 23 references / Add more references