Perspectives on Science 15 (4):397-409 (2007)

Roger Ariew
University of South Florida
There is a popular view that Descartes and Pascal were antagonists. I argue instead that Pascal was a Cartesian, in the manner of other Cartesians in the seventeenth century. That does not, of course, mean that Pascal accepted everything Descartes asserted, given that there were Cartesian atomists, for example, when Descartes was a plenist and anti-atomist. Pascal himself was a vacuuist and thus in opposition to Descartes in that respect, but he did accept some of the more distinctive and controversial aspects of Cartesianism, including his mechanistic philosophy and the consequent view that animals are automata
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc.2007.15.4.397
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,408
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

.Marjorie Garber - 1999 - Critical Inquiry 25 (4):653-679.
Pascal et la philosophie.Vincent Carraud - 1993 - Nouvelles de la République des Lettres 1:121-126.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Doctrine of Man in Descartes and Pascal.A. M. Malivskyi - 2019 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 16:133-142.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
98 ( #103,398 of 2,420,734 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #61,753 of 2,420,734 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes