Heidegger's theory of space: A critique of Dreyfus

Abstract
In a recent paper on Heidegger, Frederick Olafson attacks Hubert Dreyfus for prioritizing our “social” existence (under the notion of das Man) over the individual. In a reply, Taylor Carman, defending Dreyfus, criticizes Olafson for his “subjectivist” notion of Dasein. This paper pursues the implication of this disagreement in the context of Heidegger’s theory of space. Dreyfus’ discussion of Heideggerian spatiality nicely displays the tension between the “public” vs. “individual” domains of being, and consistent with his overall approach, Dreyfus claims that public space should be prioritized. Dreyfus concludes, however, that Heidegger is confused and prioritizes individual space. This paper argues that the categories of “public” and “individual” are inappropriate for analyzing Heidegger’s sense of the shared and personal characters of space. Heidegger’s “indexical” theory of space in fact saves both of these domains without raising the question of priority and without presupposing a “subjectivist” Dasein. On this reading, Olafson’s “individualized” account of presence does not commit him to subjectivism. The confusion Dreyfus attributes to Heidegger is cleared up by an indexical account of spatiality in Heidegger’s text.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201749508602400
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,317
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Being and Time.Ronald W. Hepburn, Martin Heidegger, John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (56):276.
Heidegger la Wittgenstein or 'Coping' with Professor Dreyfus.Frederick A. Olafson - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):45 – 64.
On Being Social: A Reply to Olafson.Taylor Carman - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):203 – 223.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Authenticity in Heidegger: A Response to Dreyfus.Elizabeth Ewing - 1995 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):469 – 487.
Individualism, Subjectivity, and Presence: A Response to Taylor Carman.Frederick A. Olafson - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):331 – 337.
Interpreting Heidegger on Das Man.Hubert L. Dreyfus - 1995 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):423 – 430.
Getting Heidegger Off the West Coast.Carleton B. Christensen - 1998 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):65 – 87.
Heidegger la Wittgenstein or 'Coping' with Professor Dreyfus.Frederick A. Olafson - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):45 – 64.
On Being Social: A Reply to Olafson.Taylor Carman - 1994 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):203 – 223.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
82 ( #71,360 of 2,223,771 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #180,515 of 2,223,771 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature