Consistent inconsistency theories

Authors
Bradley Armour-Garb
State University of New York (SUNY)
Abstract
In this paper I critically evaluate a number of current "consistent inconsistency theories" and then briefly motivate a rival position. The rival position challenges a consistent inconsistency theory, by sharing many of its basic commitments without suffering the problems that such a theory appears to face
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201740701698647
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,496
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inconsistent Languages.Ma'iti Eklund - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):251-275.
Deep Inconsistency.Matti Eklund - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (3):321-331.
Theories of Meaning and Semantic Paradox.Douglas Patterson - 2006 - In Marta Bílková & Ondřej Tomala (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2005. Filosofia. pp. 139--148.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Inconsistency in Natural Languages.Jody Azzouni - 2013 - Synthese 190 (15):3175-3184.
Keeping ‘True’: A Case Study in Conceptual Ethics.Alexis Burgess - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (5-6):580-606.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
34 ( #185,612 of 2,287,560 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #233,594 of 2,287,560 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature