Consistent inconsistency theories

Inquiry 50 (6):639 – 654 (2007)
In this paper I critically evaluate a number of current "consistent inconsistency theories" and then briefly motivate a rival position. The rival position challenges a consistent inconsistency theory, by sharing many of its basic commitments without suffering the problems that such a theory appears to face
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201740701698647
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,220
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Deep Inconsistency.Matti Eklund - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (3):321 – 331.
Theories of Meaning and Semantic Paradox.Douglas Patterson - 2006 - In Marta Bílková & Ondřej Tomala (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2005. Filosofia. pp. 139--148.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Inconsistency in Natural Languages.Jody Azzouni - 2013 - Synthese 190 (15):3175-3184.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

30 ( #170,151 of 2,164,599 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #188,391 of 2,164,599 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums