A response to Martel's 'Amo: Volu ut sis: Love, willing, and Arendt's reluctant embrace of sovereignty'

Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (6):609-617 (2012)
In this article I respond to James Martel’s essay ‘ Amo: Volu ut sis : Love, willing, and Arendt’s reluctant embrace of sovereignty’. Martel offers us a provocative account of how Arendt might have attenuated her most severe rejections of the concept of sovereignty in light of the necessity of some version of sovereignty in modern times. However, I argue that Martel misreads Arendt, drawing inferences from Arendt’s inner/outer distinction that do not follow from Arendt’s own logic. Instead of this distinction, I claim that Arendt’s rejection of sovereignty must be understood in the context of her affirmation of natality, and that a consistent reading of Arendt reveals an unstinting rejection of sovereignty, for both good and ill
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453710389993
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,651
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Aestheticism, or Aesthetic Approach, in Arendt and Heidegger on Politics.Michael Halberstam - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:219-232.
Hannah Arendt.Simon Swift - 2009 - Routledge.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

5 ( #582,478 of 2,143,563 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,855 of 2,143,563 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums