The Monist 83 (2):187-208 (2000)
Zeno argued that since at any instant an arrow does not change its location, the arrow does not move at any time, and hence motion is impossible. I discuss the following three views that one could take in view of Zeno's argument:(i) the "at-at" theory, according to which there is no such thing as instantaneous velocity, while motion in the sense of the occupation of different locations at different times is possible,(ii) the "impetus" theory, according to which instantaneous velocities do exist but these are only contingently and causally related to the temporal developments of positions,(iii) the "no instants" theory, according to which instants in time do not exist, and hence instantaneous velocities do not exist, while motion, in the sense of different areas occupied during different time intervals, is possible.I argue that, despite the fact that there have been interesting and relevant developments in mathematics and physics since the time of Zeno, each of these views still has serious drawbacks
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Weak Discernibility for Quanta, the Right Way.N. Huggett & J. Norton - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (1):39-58.
Enantiomorphy and Time.Jan-Willem Romeyn - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):167-190.
On the Time Reversal Invariance of Classical Electromagnetic Theory.David Malament - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (2):295-315.
Why Physics Uses Second Derivatives.Kenny Easwaran - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (4):845-862.
Similar books and articles
Are Instantaneous Velocities Real and Really Instantaneous?: An Argument for the Affirmative.R. S. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (2):261-280.
Are Instantaneous Velocities Real and Really Instantaneous?: An Argument for the Affirmative.Sheldon R. Smith - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (2):261-280.
An Arbitrarily Short Reply to Sheldon Smith on Instantaneous Velocities.F. Arntzenius - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (2):281-282.
Can I Be an Instantaneous Stage and yet Persist Through Time?Tobias Hansson Wahlberg - 2008 - Metaphysica 9 (2):235-239.
An Epistemological Use of Nonstandard Analysis to Answer Zeno's Objections Against Motion.William I. McLaughlin & Sylvia L. Miller - 1992 - Synthese 92 (3):371 - 384.
Instantaneous Change and the Physics of Sanctification: "Quasi-Aristotelianism" in Henry of Ghent's Quodlibet XV Q. 13.Susan Brower-Toland - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (1):19-46.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads171 ( #26,752 of 2,169,144 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #29,856 of 2,169,144 )
How can I increase my downloads?