Coping with obligations towards patient and society: an empirical study of attitudes and practice among Norwegian physicians

Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (3):158-161 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A questionnaire relating to attitudes towards setting economic priorities within the health care system was sent to all 151 general practitioners in Northern Norway. Of these, 109 (72 per cent) responded. Ninety-six per cent of the respondents agreed or partly agreed that the setting of economic priorities within the health care system was necessary. Ninety-three per cent had experienced a conflict between their responsibility towards the individual patient and the requirement for them to manage the health budget. The responses suggest that doctors act more in the interests of their patient than the interests of society. However, 68 per cent reported having refrained from giving the best treatment to patients because it was too expensive. As many as 60 per cent of the respondents wanted more public guidelines. Only 10 per cent wanted doctors to have more influence in difficult questions arising from setting priorities

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What doctors should call their patients.M. Lavin - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):129-131.
Ethical issues in family medicine.Ronald J. Christie - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by C. Barry Hoffmaster.
Promoting patient autonomy: Looking back.Gene H. Stollerman - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
The value history: A necessary family document.Renate G. Justin - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
27 (#572,408)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?