Justice and human good Philosophy 224 Gerald Doppelt and Richard Arneson spring, 2002 wednesdays 2:30-5:20 in the Phil dept seminar room, hss 7077 [Book Review]
Contemporary theories of justice frequently suppose that a legitimate state does not coerce people to comply with values or principles that they could reasonably reject. This ideal of legitimacy is thought to imply neutrality on the good: The State should not coerce people to comply with controversial conceptions of the good (which people could reasonably reject). As Ronald Dworkin puts the point, the government's policies should “be neutral on the question of the good life, or of what gives value to life." Liberal neutrality is sometimes described as a generalization of policies of religious tolerance: Just as the state should be neutral with respect to religious questions, so too the state should be neutral with respect to questions about the good life.".
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Impossibility of Political Neutrality.Noriaki Iwasa - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):147-155.
The Good Life and the Human Good.Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) - 1992 - Cambridge University Press.
Human Flourishing Versus Desire Satisfaction.Richard Arneson - 1999 - Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (1):113-142.
Liberal Neutrality or Liberal Tolerance?Colin M. Macleod - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (5):529 - 559.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #248,666 of 2,172,658 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,216 of 2,172,658 )
How can I increase my downloads?