Tools or toys? On specific challenges for modeling and the epistemology of models and computer simulations in the social sciences
AbstractMathematical models are a well established tool in most natural sciences. Although models have been neglected by the philosophy of science for a long time, their epistemological status as a link between theory and reality is now fairly well understood. However, regarding the epistemological status of mathematical models in the social sciences, there still exists a considerable unclarity. In my paper I argue that this results from specific challenges that mathematical models and especially computer simulations face in the social sciences. The most important difference between the social sciences and the natural sciences with respect to modeling is that in the social sciences powerful and well confirmed background theories (like Newtonian mechanics, quantum mechanics or the theory of relativity in physics) do not exist in the social sciences. Therefore, an epistemology of models that is formed on the role model of physics may not be appropriate for the social sciences. I discuss the challenges that modeling faces in the social sciences and point out their epistemological consequences. The most important consequences are that greater emphasis must be placed on empirical validation than on theoretical validation and that the relevance of purely theoretical simulations is strongly limited.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science.Nancy Cartwright - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science.Mary S. Morgan & Margaret Morrison (eds.) - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method.Paul Humphreys - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Galilean Idealization.Ernan McMullin - 1985 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 16 (3):247.
The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science.Nancy Cartwright - 1999 - Philosophy 75 (294):613-616.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The World as a Process: Simulations in the Natural and Social Sciences.Stephan Hartmann - 1996 - In Rainer Hegselmann (ed.), Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View.
It is Not Evolutionary Models, but Models in General That Social Science Needs.Bruce Bridgeman - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):351-352.
Computer Simulation in the Physical Sciences.Fritz Rohrlich - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:507-518.
Computer Simulation: The Cooperation Between Experimenting and Modeling.Johannes Lenhard - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (2):176-194.
Biorobotic Simulations Might Offer Some Advantages Over Purely Computational Ones.Donald R. Franceschetti - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1058-1059.
How to Build and Use Agent-Based Models in Social Science.Nigel Gilbert & Pietro Terna - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (1):57-72.