On Acting Rationally Against One's Best Judgment

Ethics 110 (3):488-513 (2000)
Abstract
I argue that akrasia is not always significantly irrational. To be more precise, I argue that an agent is sometimes more rational for being akratic then she would have been for being enkratic or strong-willed.
Keywords Rationality  Akrasia  Weakness of Will  Davidson  Irrationality  Inverse Akrasia  Practical Reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/233321
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,288
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Stronger Doctrine of Double Effect.Ben Bronner & Simon Goldstein - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-13.
The Enkratic Requirement.Allen Coates - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):320-333.
Why Care About Being an Agent?Caroline T. Arruda - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (3):488-504.
E Xpressivism and E Pistemology: E Pistemology for E Cumenical E Xpressivists.Michael Ridge - 2007 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):83-108.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
466 ( #5,433 of 2,223,640 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #23,232 of 2,223,640 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature