Reply to Pippin

Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):303 – 307 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that in his response to me Robert Pippin misrepresents my view of akrasia (partially because of what looks like his strong disbelief in the existence of akrasia) as well as expresses a false view of the way a generalizing moral theory is supposed to apply to specific cases. The last issue is related to particularism, which I turn to discuss, arguing that one familiar way in which it seems attractive is a misleading one

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Critics.Robert Pippin - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (5):506-521.
Can there be 'unprincipled virtue'? Comments on Nomy Arpaly.Robert Pippin - 2007 - Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):291 – 301.
Unending modernity.David S. Stern - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):277 – 288.
Hegel, Idealism, and Robert Pippin.Kenneth R. Westphal - 1993 - International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (3):263-272.
Modernity as autonomy.Kenneth Baynes - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):289 – 303.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
79 (#192,733)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nomy Arpaly
Brown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Unprincipled virtue: an inquiry into moral agency.Nomy Arpaly - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more references