Philosophical Disagreement and the Value-Laden Nature of Philosophy

Contemporary Pragmatism 16 (4):396-413 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Disagreement in philosophy is all-pervasive and irresolvable. There is almost no thesis in philosophy about which philosophers agree. In contrast to most contemporary accounts of philosophical disagreement, I argue that a significant proportion of philosophical disagreements are rooted in differences regarding values. A second thesis that I shall defend in this paper is that disagreements regarding values are not resolvable by argumentative means.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rationally irresolvable disagreement.Guido Melchior - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (4):1277-1304.
Verbal Disagreements and Philosophical Scepticism.Nathan Ballantyne - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (4):752-765.
Dinosaurs and Reasonable Disagreement.Margaret Greta Turnbull - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Research 46:329-344.
Philosophical Peer Disagreement.Nicolás Lo Guercio - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (3):459-467.
Implicaciones Metafilosóficas de Los Desacuerdos Filosóficos Profundos.Octavio García - 2022 - Cuadernos de Filosofía: Universidad de Concepción 40:117-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-30

Downloads
38 (#648,670)

6 months
6 (#700,616)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gustavo Arroyo
Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento

Citations of this work

Viewpoint Convergence as a Philosophical Defect.Grace Helton - forthcoming - In Sanford C. Goldberg & Mark Walker, Attitude in Philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references