The phylogeography debate and the epistemology of model-based evolutionary biology

Biology and Philosophy 29 (6):833-850 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Phylogeography, a relatively new subdicipline of evolutionary biology that attempts to unify the fields of phylogenetics and population biology in an explicit geographical context, has hosted in recent years a highly polarized debate related to the purported benefits and limitations that qualitative versus quantitative methods might contribute or impose on inferential processes in evolutionary biology. Here we present a friendly, non-technical introduction to the conflicting methods underlying the controversy, and exemplify it with a balanced selection of quotes from the primary biological literature, to invite the philosophy of biology community to pay attention to the elements that have played a primary role in its presumed resolution. We also present the basic features of our own metascientific take on the debate, and point out—as a preliminary step in preparation for upcoming, more detailed treatments—the importance that appeals to authority in fields external to phylogeography per se have played in the current status of this highly visible evolutionary biology dispute

Similar books and articles

Popper, falsifiability, and evolutionary biology.David N. Stamos - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.
Evolutionary epistemology as science.H. C. Plotkin - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):295-313.
Karl Popper's philosophy of biology.Michael Ruse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):638-661.
Assessing evolutionary epistemology.Michael Bradie - 1986 - Biology and Philosophy 1 (4):401-459.
How Evolutionary Biology Presently Pervades Cell and Molecular Biology.Michel Morange - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):113 - 120.
Evolutionary biology: puzzle solving or paradigm shifting?Massimo Pigliucci - 2006 - Quarterly Review of Biology 81 (4):377-379.
The use and abuse of sir Karl Popper.David L. Hull - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):481-504.
Review of Sober's "philosophy of biology". [REVIEW]J. Dupre - 1996 - British Journal for Philosophy of Science 63:143-145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-18

Downloads
508 (#34,947)

6 months
97 (#41,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francisco Vergara-Silva
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

References found in this work

The logic of scientific discovery.Karl Raimund Popper - 1934 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Hutchinson Publishing Group.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl R. Popper - 1959 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 14 (3):383-383.

View all 12 references / Add more references