Keeping postdiction simple

Consciousness and Cognition 38:205-216 (2015)

Valtteri Arstila
University of Turku (PhD)
abstract Postdiction effects are phenomena in which a stimulus influences the appearance of events taking place before it. In metacontrast masking, for instance, a masking stimulus can ren- der a target stimulus shown before the mask invisible. This and other postdiction effects have been considered incompatible with a simple explanation according to which (i) our perceptual experiences are delayed for only the time it takes for a distal stimulus to reach our sensory receptors and for our neural mechanisms to process it, and (ii) the order in which the processing of stimuli is completed corresponds with the apparent temporal order of stimuli. As a result, the theories that account for more than a single postdiction effect reject at least one of these theses. This paper presents a new framework for the tim- ing of experiences—the non-linear latency difference view—in which the three most dis- cussed postdiction effects—apparent motion, the flash-lag effect, and metacontrast masking—can be accounted for while simultaneously holding theses (i) and (ii). This view is grounded in the local reentrant processes, which are known to have a crucial role in perception. Accordingly, the non-linear latency difference view is both more parsimonious and more empirically plausible than the competing theories, all of which remain largely silent about the neural implementation of the mechanisms they postulate.
Keywords Postdiction  Metacontrast masking  Flash-lag effect  Apparent motion
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2015.10.001
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,401
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Perceptual Consciousness Overflows Cognitive Access.Ned Block - 2011 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (12):567-575.
Temporal Experience.L. A. Paul - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (7):333-359.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Temporal Experiences Without the Specious Present.Valtteri Arstila - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (2):287-302.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Keeping Republican Freedom Simple.Philip Pettit - 2002 - Political Theory 30 (3):339-356.
ICT: Keeping It Simple and Sustainable.Peter Hoban - 2009 - Ethos: Social Education Victoria 17 (4):7.
Motivated Contextualism.David Henderson - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):119 - 131.
Theories of Apparent Motion.Valtteri Arstila - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (3):337-358.
Keeping It Simple, Socially.Louise Barrett & Peter Henzi - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):743-744.
Keeping Republican Freedom Simple.of Republican Liberty - 2002 - Political Theory 30 (3):339-356.
Effectively and Noneffectively Nowhere Simple Sets.Valentina S. Harizanov - 1996 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 42 (1):241-248.
The Number of Types in Simple Theories.Enrique Casanovas - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 98 (1-3):69-86.
N-Simple Theories.Alexei S. Kolesnikov - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 131 (1-3):227-261.


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #364,881 of 2,255,382 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #567,508 of 2,255,382 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature