Richard T. W. Arthur
McMaster University
In this reassessment of Descartes' debt to his mentor Isaac Beeckman, I argue that they share the same basic conception of motion: the force of a body's motion—understood as the force of persisting in that motion, shorn of any connotations of internal cause—is conserved through God's direct action, is proportional to the speed and magnitude of the body, and is gained or lost only through collisions. I contend that this constitutes a fully coherent ontology of motion, original with Beeckman and consistent with his atomism, which, notwithstanding Descartes' own profoundly original contributions to the theory of motion, is basic to all Descartes' further work in natural philosophy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.2007.0001
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,636
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Hydrostatic Paradox and the Origins of Cartesian Dynamics.Stephen Gaukroger & John Schuster - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):535-572.
Avertissement.[author unknown] - 1949 - Dialectica 3 (4):247-247.
Avertissement.[author unknown] - 1985 - Heidegger Studies 1:3-3.
Martial GUEROULT.[author unknown] - 1976 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 166:507.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
112 ( #98,957 of 2,462,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,178 of 2,462,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes