“A Lot More Bad News for Conservatives, and a Little Bit of Bad News for Liberals? Moral Judgments and the Dark Triad Personality Traits: A Follow-up Study”
Neuroethics 6 (1):51-64 (2012)
AbstractIn a recent study appearing in Neuroethics, I reported observing 11 significant correlations between the “Dark Triad” personality traits – Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Psychopathy – and “conservative” judgments on a 17-item Moral Intuition Survey. Surprisingly, I observed no significant correlations between the Dark Triad and “liberal” judgments. In order to determine whether these results were an artifact of the particular issues I selected, I ran a follow-up study testing the Dark Triad against conservative and liberal judgments on 15 additional moral issues. The new issues examined include illegal immigration, abortion, the teaching of “intelligent design” in public schools, the use of waterboarding and other “enhanced interrogation techniques” in the war on terrorism, laws defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman, and environmentalism. 1154 participants (680 male, 472 female; median age 29), recruited online through Amazon Mechanical Turk, completed three surveys: a 15-item Moral Intuition Survey (MIS), the 28-item Short Dark Triad personality inventory, and a five-item demographic survey. The results strongly reinforce my earlier findings. Twenty-two significant correlations were observed between “conservative” judgments and the Dark Triad (all of which were significant past a Bonferonni-corrected significance threshold of p = .0008), compared to seven significant correlations between Dark Triad and “liberal” judgments (only one of which was significant past p = .0008). This article concludes by developing a novel research proposal for determining whether the results of my two studies are “bad news” for conservatives or liberals.
Similar books and articles
Bad News for Conservatives? Moral Judgments and the Dark Triad Personality Traits: A Correlational Study.Marcus Arvan - 2011 - Neuroethics 6 (2):307-318.
Individual Differences in the Moralization of Everyday Life.Benjamin J. Lovett, Alexander H. Jordan & Scott S. Wiltermuth - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (4):248-257.
Balancing good news and bad news: An ethical obligation?Mary-Lou Galician & Steve Pasternack - 1987 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 2 (2):82 – 92.
The Ineffable and the Incalculable: G. E. Moore on Ethical Expertise.Ben Eggleston - 2005 - In Lisa Rasmussen (ed.), Ethics Expertise: History, Contemporary Perspectives, and Applications. Springer. pp. 89–102.
Individual Difference Variables, Ethical Judgments, and Ethical Behavioral Intentions.Gene Brown - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (2):183-206.
Sensationalism versus news of the moral life: Making the distinction.Karen L. Slattery - 1994 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (1):5 – 15.
Relationship between machiavellianism and type a personality and ethical-orientation.J. Michael Rayburn & L. Gayle Rayburn - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1209 - 1219.
An Examination of the Effects of Sport Involvement on Ethical Judgments in Sport and Business.Paula L. Rechner & Dennis L. Smart - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (2):142 - 157.
Intention, temporal order, and moral judgments.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Ron Mallon, Tom Mccoy & Jay G. Hull - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (1):90–106.
“Stupid people deserve what they get”: The effects of personality assessment on judgments of intentional action.Berit Brogaard - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):332-334.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
What’s up with anti-natalists? An observational study on the relationship between dark triad personality traits and anti-natalist views.Philipp Schönegger - 2022 - Philosophical Psychology 35 (1):66-94.
Intuitive And Reflective Responses In Philosophy.Nick Byrd - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Colorado
The Dirty Dozen Scale: Validation of a Polish Version and Extension of the Nomological Net.Anna Z. Czarna, Peter K. Jonason, Michael Dufner & Małgorzata Kossowska - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
References found in this work
No references found.