In Neurofunctional Prudence and Morality: A Philosophical Theory. New York: Routledge. pp. 60-94 (2020)

Authors
Marcus Arvan
University of Tampa
Abstract
This chapter derives and refines a novel normative moral theory and descriptive theory of moral psychology--Rightness as Fairness--from the theory of prudence defended in Chapter 2. It briefly summarizes Chapter 2’s finding that prudent agents typically internalize ‘moral risk-aversion’. It then outlines how this prudential psychology leads prudent agents to want to know how to act in ways they will not regret in morally salient cases, as well as to regard moral actions as the only types of actions that satisfy this prudential interest. It then uses these findings to defend a new derivation of my (2016) theory of morality, Rightness as Fairness, showing how the derivation successfully defends Rightness as Fairness against a variety of objections. The chapter also details how this book’s theory helps to substantiate the claim that Rightness as Fairness unifies a variety of competing moral frameworks: deontology, consequentialism, contractualism, and virtue ethics. Finally, the chapter shows how Chapter 2’s theory of prudence entails some revisions to Rightness as Fairness, including the adoption of a series of Rawlsian original positions to settle moral and social-political issues under ideal and nonideal circumstances—thus entailing a unified normative and descriptive psychological framework for prudence, morality, and justice.
Keywords prudence  morality  fairness  rationality  justice  moral psychology  original position  ideal theory  nonideal theory  Rawls
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Regard for Reason in the Moral Mind.Joshua May - 2018 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Normative Stance.Marcus Arvan - 2021 - Philosophical Forum 52 (1):79-89.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Nonideal Justice as Nonideal Fairness.Marcus Arvan - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (2):208-228.
Wise Action: An Examination of Prudence and Morality.David Phillips Kaspar - 2003 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Can Morality Do Without Prudence?David Kaspar - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (2):311-326.
First Steps Toward a Nonideal Theory of Justice.Marcus Arvan - 2014 - Ethics and Global Politics 7 (3):95-117.
Contractualism, Politics, and Morality.Adam Hosein - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (4):495-508.
Rawls' Avowed Error in Rational Contractarianism.Jung Soon Park - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:325-340.
Prudence and Anti-Prudence.Evan Simpson - 1998 - American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (1):73 - 86.
Justice as Fairness in a Broken World.Marcus Arvan - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 4 (2):95-126.
A Nonideal Theory of Justice.Marcus Arvan - 2008 - Dissertation, University of Arizona

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-02-17

Total views
118 ( #87,782 of 2,438,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #22,595 of 2,438,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes