Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Michael Huemer argues that cross-cultural convergence toward liberal moral values is evidence of objective moral progress, and by extension, evidence for moral realism. Nathan Cofnas claims to debunk Huemer’s argument by contending that convergence toward liberal moral values can be better explained by ‘two related non-truth-tracking processes’: self-interest and its long-term tendency to result in social conditions conducive to greater empathy. This article argues that although Cofnas successfully debunks Huemer’s convergence argument for one influential form of moral realism – Robust Moral Realism, which holds that moral facts are non-natural, stance-independent normative facts – Cofnas’s debunking argument broadly supports a second type of moral realism: Enlightened Self-Interest Realism, the view that moral facts are reducible to stance-dependent requirements of instrumental (‘means-end’) rationality. Finally, this article argues that insofar as different Enlightened Self-Interest Realist theories make specific predictions about the intra- and inter-personal mechanisms behind moral convergence toward liberalism, empirical observations of cross-cultural convergence can provide independent support for Enlightened Self-Interest Realism. I conclude that this is an important mark in favor of Enlightened Self-Interest Realism over Robust Moral Realism.
|
Keywords | ethics evolution metaethics moral realism naturalism non-naturalism convergence contractarianism liberalism Hobbes fairness |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Debunking Explanation for Moral Progress.Nathan Cofnas - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (11):3171-3191.
Debunking Morality: Lessons From the EAAN Literature.Andrew Moon - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):208-226.
A Liberal Realist Answer to Debunking Skeptics: The Empirical Case for Realism.Michael Huemer - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (7):1983-2010.
Methodological Naturalism in Metaethics.Daniel Nolan - 2017 - In Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. Routledge. pp. 659-673.
Environ-Moral Realism: Some Prospects for Environmental Metaethics.John Mizzoni - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:191-221.
Environ-Moral Realism: Some Prospects for Environmental Metaethics.John Mizzoni - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:191-221.
Only All Naturalists Should Worry About Only One Evolutionary Debunking Argument.Tomas Bogardus - 2016 - Ethics 126 (3):636-661.
Survival of Defeat - Evolution, Moral Objectivity, and Undercutting.Michael Klenk - 2018 - Dissertation, Utrecht University
Redeeming Love:Rousseau and Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy.Mark S. Cladis - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2):221-251.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2022-02-07
Total views
20 ( #554,969 of 2,498,795 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #42,703 of 2,498,795 )
2022-02-07
Total views
20 ( #554,969 of 2,498,795 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #42,703 of 2,498,795 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads