From rational self-interest to liberalism: a hole in Cofnas’s debunking explanation of moral progress

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Michael Huemer argues that cross-cultural convergence toward liberal moral values is evidence of objective moral progress, and by extension, evidence for moral realism. Nathan Cofnas claims to debunk Huemer’s argument by contending that convergence toward liberal moral values can be better explained by ‘two related non-truth-tracking processes’: self-interest and its long-term tendency to result in social conditions conducive to greater empathy. This article argues that although Cofnas successfully debunks Huemer’s convergence argument for one influential form of moral realism – Robust Moral Realism, which holds that moral facts are non-natural, stance-independent normative facts – Cofnas’s debunking argument broadly supports a second type of moral realism: Enlightened Self-Interest Realism, the view that moral facts are reducible to stance-dependent requirements of instrumental (‘means-end’) rationality. Finally, this article argues that insofar as different Enlightened Self-Interest Realist theories make specific predictions about the intra- and inter-personal mechanisms behind moral convergence toward liberalism, empirical observations of cross-cultural convergence can provide independent support for Enlightened Self-Interest Realism. I conclude that this is an important mark in favor of Enlightened Self-Interest Realism over Robust Moral Realism.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A debunking explanation for moral progress.Nathan Cofnas - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (11):3171-3191.
Debunking Morality: Lessons from the EAAN Literature.Andrew Moon - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):208-226.
Methodological Naturalism in Metaethics.Daniel Nolan - 2017 - In Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. Routledge. pp. 659-673.
Yes to realism! No to nonnaturalism! Ulysses - 2009 - Kritike 3 (1):168-177.
Debunking Nontheistic Moral Realism.Adam Lloyd Johnson - 2015 - Philosophia Christi 17 (2):353-367.
Environ-Moral Realism.John Mizzoni - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:191-221.
Environ-Moral Realism.John Mizzoni - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:191-221.
God and Morality.Anne Jeffrey - 2019 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Puzzle of Pure Moral Motivation.Adam Lerner - 2018 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 13:123-144.
Redeeming Love:Rousseau and Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy.Mark S. Cladis - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2):221-251.


Added to PP

83 (#156,829)

6 months
29 (#56,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcus Arvan
University of Tampa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations