Authors
Marcus Arvan
University of Tampa
Abstract
Allen Buchanan has argued that a widely defended view of the nature of the state – the view that the state is a discretionary association for the mutual advantage of its members – must be rejected because it cannot adequately account for moral requirements of humanitarian intervention. This paper argues that Buchanan’s objection is unsuccessful,and moreover, that discretionary association theories can preserve an important distinction that Buchanan’s alternative approach to political legitimacy cannot: the distinction between “internal” legitimacy (a state’s ability to morally justify itself to its own members) and “external” legitimacy (a state’s ability to morally justify itself to humanity more broadly).
Keywords legitimacy  contract  political  Rawls  Locke  humanitarian  aid  human rights  association  international
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.26556/jesp.v3i2.127
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 1993 - Critical Inquiry 20 (1):36-68.
Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition.John Rawls - 2005 - Columbia University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-06-02

Total views
476 ( #18,842 of 2,498,767 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #280,195 of 2,498,767 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes