Journal of Moral Philosophy:1-32 (forthcoming)
AbstractTo what extent are authors morally culpable for harms caused by their published work? Can authors be culpable even if their ideas are misused, perhaps because they failed to take precautions to prevent harmful misinterpretations? Might authors be culpable even if they do take precautions—if, for example, they publish ideas that others can be reasonably expected to put to harmful uses, precautions notwithstanding? Although complete answers to these questions depend upon controversial views about the right to free speech, this paper argues that five notions from philosophy of law and legal practice—liability, burden of proof, legal causation, mens rea, and reasoning by precedent—can be adapted to provide an attractive moral framework for determining whether an author’s work causes harm, whether and how culpable the author is for causing such harm, steps authors may take to immunize themselves from culpability, and how to responsibly develop new rules for publishing ethics.
Similar books and articles
Supporting the call for improving the code of publication ethics to incorporate editorial decisions regarding the causation of harm by publication.Henk P. Giele - 2021 - Clinical Ethics 16 (3):163-164.
Treating Moral Harm as Social Harm: Toward a Restorative Ethics of Christian Responsibility.Wonchul Shin & Elizabeth M. Bounds - 2017 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 37 (2):153-169.
Unconscious Mens Rea: Criminal Responsibility for Lapses and Minimally Conscious States.Katrina Sifferd - 2016 - In Dennis Patterson & Michael Pardo (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Are Individualist Accounts of Collective Responsibility Morally Deficient?Andras Szigeti - 2013 - In A. Konzelmann Ziv & H. B. Schmid (eds.), Institutions, Emotions, and Group Agents. Springer. pp. 329-342.
Moral responsibility for unprevented harm.Friderik Klampfer - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):119-161.
Defensive Liability: A Matter of Rights Enforcement, not Distributive Justice.Susanne Burri - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (3):539-553.
Animal Rights and the Duty to Harm: When to be a Harm Causing Deontologist.C. E. Abbate - 2020 - Journal for Ethics and Moral Philosophy 3 (1):5-26.
Constructing ethical research narratives in criminological research.Ian Mahoney & Tony Kearon - 2018 - Research Ethics 14 (2):1-5.
Defining Disease in the Context of Overdiagnosis.Mary Jean Walker & Wendy Rogers - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal 20 (2):269-280.
An Islamic Bioethics Framework to Justify the At-risk Adolescents’ Regulations on Access to Key Reproductive Health Services.Forouzan Akrami, Alireza Zali & Mahmoud Abbasi - 2022 - Asian Bioethics Review 14 (3):225-235.
Children hold owners responsible when property causes harm.Celina K. Bowman-Smith, Brandon W. Goulding & Ori Friedman - 2018 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147 (8):1191-1199.
Should all medical research be published? The moral responsibility of medical journal editors.Thomas Ploug - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (10):703.2-709.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Kant and Lying to the Murderer at the Door... One More Time: Kant's Legal Philosophy and Lies to Murderers and Nazis.Helga Varden - 2010 - Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (4):403-4211.
A theory of freedom of expression.Thomas Scanlon - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):204-226.