Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes
Frontiers in Psychology 4 (2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Consciousness wanted, attention found: Reasons for the advantage of the left visual field in identifying T2 among rapidly presented series.Rolf Verleger & Kamila Śmigasiewicz - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 35:260-273.
Limited transfer of subliminal response priming to novel stimulus orientations and identities.Katrin Elsner, Wilfried Kunde & Andrea Kiesel - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (3):657-671.
Monocular recognition of letters and Landolt Cs in left and right visual hemifields.Howard Markowitz & Donald O. Weitzman - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):187.
A high-loaded hemisphere successfully ignores distractors.Ritsuko Nishimura & Kazuhito Yoshizaki - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):953-961.
Effects of unseen stimuli on reaction times to seen stimuli in monkeys with blindsight.Alan Cowey, Petra Stoerig & Carolyne Le Mare - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):312-323.
Influence of aesthetic perception on visual event-related potentials.Marina de Tommaso, Carla Pecoraro, Michele Sardaro, Claudia Serpino, Giulio Lancioni & Paolo Livrea - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (3):933-945.
Emotional context influences access of visual stimuli to anxious individuals' awareness.Lital Ruderman & Dominique Lamy - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):900-914.
Suppression of novel stimuli: Changes in accessibility of suppressed nonverbalizable shapes.Rhiannon E. Hart & Jonathan W. Schooler - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1541-1546.
The influence of synesthesia on eye movements: No synesthetic pop-out in an oculomotor target selection task.Tanja C. W. Nijboer, Gabriela Satris & Stefan Van der Stigchel - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1193-1200.
Strength of visual percept generated by famous faces perceived without awareness: Effects of affective valence, response latency, and visual field☆.Anna Stone & Tim Valentine - 2005 - Consciousness and Cognition 14 (3):548-564.
Development of preferences for the human body shape in infancy.Virginia Slaughter, Michelle Heron & Susan Sim - 2002 - Cognition 85 (3):71-81.
The mnemonic span for visual and auditory digits.Arthur I. Gates - 1916 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 1 (5):393.
The effect of flanking letters and digits on speed of identifying a letter.Charles W. Eriksen, Roy M. Hamlin & Connie Daye - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2 (6):400-402.
Individual differences in metacontrast masking are enhanced by perceptual learning.Thorsten Albrecht, Susan Klapötke & Uwe Mattler - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (2):656-666.
Dynamic variations in affective priming.P. Wong - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (2):147-168.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
17 (#640,951)
6 months
3 (#224,882)
2016-06-30
Downloads
17 (#640,951)
6 months
3 (#224,882)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Sustained Attention in Real Classroom Settings: An EEG Study.Li-Wei Ko, Oleksii Komarov, W. David Hairston, Tzyy-Ping Jung & Chin-Teng Lin - 2017 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11.
Consciousness wanted, attention found: Reasons for the advantage of the left visual field in identifying T2 among rapidly presented series.Rolf Verleger & Kamila Śmigasiewicz - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 35:260-273.
References found in this work
Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.R. Desimone & J. Duncan - 1995 - Annual Review of Neuroscience 18 (1):193-222.
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.M. Corbetta & G. L. Shulman - 2002 - Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 (3):201-215.