Synthese 196 (2):587-609 (2019)

Authors
Jamin Asay
University of Hong Kong
Abstract
Scientific realism and anti-realism are most frequently discussed as global theses: theses that apply equally well across the board to all the various sciences. Against this status quo I defend the localist alternative, a methodological stance on scientific realism that approaches debates on realism at the level of individual sciences, rather than at science itself. After identifying the localist view, I provide a number of arguments in its defense, drawing on the diversity and disunity found in the sciences, as well as problems with other approaches (such as basing realism debates on the aim of science). I also show how the view is already at work, explicitly or implicitly, in the work of several philosophers of science. After meeting the objections that localism collapses either into globalism or hyperlocalism, I conclude by sketching what sorts of impacts localism can have in the philosophy of science.
Keywords Scientific Realism  Localism  Constructive empiricism  Disunity of science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-016-1072-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.

View all 91 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Methodological Defense of Realism Scrutinized.K. Brad Wray - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:74-79.
Answering Some Objections To Scientific Realism.S. Hood - 2002 - Florida Philosophical Review 2 (2):73-83.
Does Scientific Realism Matter?Carl Alan Matheson - 1986 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
Aimless Science.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2014 - Synthese 191 (6):1211-1221.
Scientific Realism.Bruce Reichenbach - 2010 - In Melville Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1011--1033.
On Scientific Realism: In Defence of a Deflationary Approach.Daniel Mcarthur - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Ottawa (Canada)
Constructive Empiricism and Anti-Realism.Sam Mitchell - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:174 - 180.
What is Wrong with Husserl's Scientific Anti-Realism?Harald A. Wiltsche - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (2):105-130.
Realism, Anti-Realism, and the Success of Science.David Marcus Shein - 2002 - Dissertation, City University of New York

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-03-18

Total views
749 ( #9,840 of 2,507,704 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #17,151 of 2,507,704 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes