Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):3249-3270 (2020)

To consider whether or not we should aim to create a perfect healthy utopia on Earth, we focus on the SF novel Harmony, written by Japanese writer Project Ito, and analyze various issues in the world established in the novel from a bioethical standpoint. In the world depicted in Harmony, preserving health and life is a top priority. Super-medicine is realized through highly advanced medical technologies. Citizens in Harmony are required to strictly control themselves to achieve perfect health and must always disclose their health information to the public and continuously prove their health. From a bioethical standpoint, the world in Harmony is governed by a “healthy longevity supremacy” principle, with being healthy equated to being good and right. Privacy no longer exists, as it is perceived ethical for citizens to openly communicate health-related information to establish one’s credibility. Moreover, there is no room for self-determination concerning healthcare because medical interventions and care are completely routinized, automated, centralized, and instantly provided. This is a situation where the community exhibits extremely powerful and effective paternalism. One can argue that healthy longevity is highly preferred. But is it right to aim for a perfectly healthy society at all costs? Should we sacrifice freedom, privacy, vivid feelings, and personal dignity to achieve such a world? In our view, the answer is no, as this would require the loss of many essential values. We conclude by proposing an alternative governing principle for future healthcare, and refer to it as the “do-everything-in-moderation” principle.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-020-00269-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can God Be Free?William L. Rowe - 2003 - Clarendon Press.
Death in Traffic: Why Are the Ethical Issues Ignored?Leonard Evans - 2008 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 2 (1).
Can God Be Free?William L. Rowe - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (4):405-424.
Response to Hasker.William L. Rowe - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (4):463-466.
We Are Better Off Without Perfect Perception.Eli Brenner & Jeroen B. J. Smeets - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):215-216.
Why Only Perfection Is Good Enough.Nicholas Everitt - 2000 - Philosophical Papers 29 (3):155-158.
Possible Worlds and the Best Arrangement of Things in Fakhr Razi’s View.Abdullah Taravavi & Amir Divani - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 17 (66):149-165.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,137,660 of 2,519,819 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,819 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes