Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes

Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (2):125-165 (2009)
Work on a computer program called SMILE + IBP (SMart Index Learner Plus Issue-Based Prediction) bridges case-based reasoning and extracting information from texts. The program addresses a technologically challenging task that is also very relevant from a legal viewpoint: to extract information from textual descriptions of the facts of decided cases and apply that information to predict the outcomes of new cases. The program attempts to automatically classify textual descriptions of the facts of legal problems in terms of Factors, a set of classification concepts that capture stereotypical fact patterns that effect the strength of a legal claim, here trade secret misappropriation. Using these classifications, the program can evaluate and explain predictions about a problem’s outcome given a database of previously classified cases. This paper provides an extended example illustrating both functions, prediction by IBP and text classification by SMILE, and reports empirical evaluations of each. While IBP’s results are quite strong, and SMILE’s much weaker, SMILE + IBP still has some success predicting and explaining the outcomes of case scenarios input as texts. It marks the first time to our knowledge that a program can reason automatically about legal case texts.
Keywords Predicting case outcomes  Classifying case texts  Case-based reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10506-009-9077-9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,829
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Extractive Summarisation of Legal Texts.Ben Hachey & Claire Grover - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (4):305-345.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Factor-Based Definition of Precedential Constraint.John F. Horty & Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (2):181-214.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma.Lawrence B. Solum - 1987 - University of Chicago Law Review 54:462.
Extractive Summarisation of Legal Texts.Ben Hachey & Claire Grover - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (4):305-345.
Innovative Techniques for Legal Text Retrieval.Marie-Francine Moens - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):29-57.
Searching Information in Legal Hypertext Systems.Jacques Savoy - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (3):205-232.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

28 ( #185,059 of 2,178,178 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #35,572 of 2,178,178 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums