Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (6):368-373 (2011)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Background If trials of therapeutic interventions are to serve society's interests, they must be of high methodological quality and must satisfy moral commitments to human subjects. The authors set out to develop a clinical - trials compendium in which standards for the ethical treatment of human subjects are integrated with standards for research methods. Methods The authors rank-ordered the world's nations and chose the 31 with >700 active trials as of 24 July 2008. Governmental and other authoritative entities of the 31 countries were searched, and 1004 English-language documents containing ethical and/or methodological standards for clinical trials were identified. The authors extracted standards from 144 of those: 50 designated as ‘core’, 39 addressing trials of invasive procedures and a 5% sample of the remainder. As the integrating framework for the standards we developed a coherent taxonomy encompassing all elements of a trial's stages. Findings Review of the 144 documents yielded nearly 15 000 discrete standards. After duplicates were removed, 5903 substantive standards remained, distributed in the taxonomy as follows: initiation, 1401 standards, 8 divisions; design, 1869 standards, 16 divisions; conduct, 1473 standards, 8 divisions; analysing and reporting results, 997 standards, four divisions; and post-trial standards, 168 standards, 5 divisions. Conclusions The overwhelming number of source documents and standards uncovered in this study was not anticipated beforehand and confirms the extraordinary complexity of the clinical trials enterprise. This taxonomy of multinational ethical and methodological standards may help trialists and overseers improve the quality of clinical trials, particularly given the globalisation of clinical research
|
Keywords | info:mesh/Biomedical Research info:mesh/Informed Consent info:mesh/Clinical Trials as Topic info:mesh/Drug Therapy info:mesh/Research Design info:mesh/Humans Humans Drug Therapy Biomedical Research Research Design International Cooperation |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1136/jme.2010.039255 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Consistency in Decision Making by Research Ethics Committees: A Controlled Comparison.E. Angell, A. J. Sutton, K. Windridge & M. Dixon-Woods - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (11):662-664.
Methodological Quality and Reporting of Ethical Requirements in Clinical Trials.M. Ruiz-Canela - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):172-176.
Citations of this work BETA
Conflicts Among Multinational Ethical and Scientific Standards for Clinical Trials of Therapeutic Interventions.Jacob M. Kolman, Nelda P. Wray, Carol M. Ashton, Danielle M. Wenner, Anna F. Jarman & Baruch A. Brody - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):99-121.
Do Surgical Trials Meet the Scientific Standards for Clinical Trials.Danielle M. Wenner, Baruch A. Brody, Anna Jarman, Jacob M. Kolman, Nelda Wray & Carol Ashton - 2012 - Journal of the American College of Surgeons 215 (5):722-730.
Trials and Tribulations: The Professional Development of Surgical Trialists.Danielle M. Wenner, Anna Jarman, Nelda Wray & Carol Ashton - 2012 - American Journal of Surgery 204 (3):339-346.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-04
Total views
155 ( #75,350 of 2,504,607 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #60,422 of 2,504,607 )
2013-11-04
Total views
155 ( #75,350 of 2,504,607 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #60,422 of 2,504,607 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads