On the relationship among identification, similarity, and categorization: Reply to Nosofsky and Smith

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.385
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Similarity, Identification, and Categorization: Comment on Ashby and Lee.Robert M. Nosofsky & J. E. Keith Smith - 1992 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121 (2):237-245.
Attention, Similarity, and the Identification–Categorization Relationship.Robert M. Nosofsky - 1986 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1):39-57.
Predicting Similarity and Categorization From Identification.F. Gregory Ashby & W. William Lee - 1991 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120 (2):150-172.
The Rules Versus Similarity Distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Illuminating Reasoning and Categorization.Evan Heit & Brett K. Hayes - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):27-27.
Attention, Similarity, and the Context Theory of Classification.R. M. Nosofsky - 1986 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 115:39-57.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,170,649 of 2,260,782 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #647,012 of 2,260,782 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature