Role Ethics or Ethics of Role-Play? A Comparative Critical Analysis of the Ethics of Confucianism and the Bhagavad Gītā

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (1):1-21 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both Confucianism and the Bhagavad Gītā emphasize the moral authority of social roles. But how deep does the likeness between these ethical philosophies run? In this essay I focus upon two significant points of comparison between the role-based ethics of Confucianism and the Gītā: (1) the interrelation between formalized social roles and family feeling, and (2) the religious dimension of moral action. How is it that Confucians ground their social roles in family feeling, while the Gītā emphasizes rupture between role and sentiment? Furthermore, are we to understand Confucianism as presenting a social philosophy that eschews religious concerns, whereas the Gītā denies the moral significance of family feeling in lieu of obtaining soteriological freedom? Examining the aesthetic and religious dimensions of the ethics of Confucianism and the Gītā clarifies a key distinction that both views implicitly make, albeit for divergent reasons: the difference between living one’s roles and playing one’s roles

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,420

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-12

Downloads
43 (#365,571)

6 months
3 (#1,247,868)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Geoffrey Ashton
University of San Francisco

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Confucian role ethics: a vocabulary.Roger T. Ames - 2011 - Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
A Source Book in Indian Philosophy.Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan & Charles A. Moore - 1957 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. Edited by Charles Alexander Moore.
Presuppositions of India's philosophies.Karl H. Potter - 1963 - Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

View all 9 references / Add more references