Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (12):826-827 (2019)

In a previous article, I argued that assessment requirements for transgender hormone replacement therapy are unethical and dehumanising. A recent response published by the Journal of Medical Ethics criticises this proposal. In this reply, I advance that their response misunderstood core parts of my argument and fails to provide independent support for assessment requirements. Though transition-related care may have similarities with cosmetic surgeries, this does not suffice to establish a need for assessments, and nor do the high rates of depression and anxiety justify assessments, especially given the protective role HRT plays towards mental well-being.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105628
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,909
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Need for Donor Consent in Mitochondrial Replacement.G. Owen Schaefer - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):825-829.
The Role of Regret in Informed Consent.Miles Little - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):49-59.
Informed Consent: Good Medicine, Dangerous Side Effects.Bruce N. Waller & Robyn A. Repko - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):66-74.
Using Informed Consent to Save Trust.Nir Eyal - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):437-444.
The Unethics of Hormone Replacement Therapy.Renate Klein - 1992 - Bioethics News 11 (3):24-37.


Added to PP index

Total views
4 ( #1,203,014 of 2,402,091 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,323 of 2,402,091 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes