Social and behavioral researchers' experiences with their irbs

Ethics and Behavior 17 (1):1 – 17 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A national survey on researchers’ experiences with their institutional review boards (IRBs) is presented, focused exclusively on social and behavioral researchers. A wide range of experiences is apparent in the data, especially in terms of turnaround time for submitted protocols, incidence of data collection without prior IRB approval, and stated reasons for "going solo." Sixty-two percent felt that the turnaround time they typically experience is "reasonable," and 44% said they had not experienced long delays in obtaining approval. However, 48% of respondents reported either conducting a project without IRB approval or modifying an existing project without IRB approval, with anticipated time for approval being the dominant reason offered for doing so. This adds a new dimension to the widely discussed "national IRB crisis" (e.g., Illinois White Paper, 2005). The article concludes with 2 preliminary recommendations for IRB reform

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conflicting interests, social justice and proxy consent to research.Daryl Pullman - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (5):523 – 545.
Research ethics committees: A regional approach.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):161-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#486,491)

6 months
6 (#528,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?