The Futility of Futility: Death Causation is the 'Elephant in the Room' in Discussions about Limitation of Medical Treatment [Book Review]

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):151-154 (2011)
Abstract
The term futility has been widely used in medical ethics and clinical medicine for more than twenty years now. At first glance it appears to offer a clear-cut categorical characterisation of medical treatments at the end of life, and an apparently objective way of making decisions that are seen to be emotionally painful for those close to the patient, and ethically, and also potentially legally hazardous for clinicians. It also appears to deal with causation, because omission of a futile treatment cannot surely be a cause of death. The problem is that futility can be argued to be a false friend , in that it gives an appearance of representing a reliable conceptual basis, in ethics, for limitation of medical treatment—usually in the context of dying—without actually doing so. In fact, the concept of futility is a conflation of clinical judgement about outcomes of treatment and the quality or even value of life, and has really failed to contribute much to the advancement of decision-making and hence care at the end-of-life. It also has the capacity to medicalise the personal space. Deliberations about the likely outcomes of medical treatment are necessary, and medical expertise is pivotal. However, futility is argued to have a better future in partnership with a broad social action agenda about the process of dying, such as that articulated in health promoting palliative care, as a basis for better death-ways in the 21st century (Kellehear 2005). Medicine needs to more honest and upfront about its limits, as death is, after all, the elephant in everybody's room
Keywords Futility  End of life  Palliative care  Death  Medical decision-making
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9291-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,812
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

At Law.Alexander Morgan Capron - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (5):42-43.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Futility and the Varieties of Medical Judgment.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2).
Defining Medical Futility and Improving Medical Care.Lawrence Schneiderman - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):123-131.
A Broader Look at Medical Futility.Wayne Shelton - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (4):383-400.
The Physician's Authority to Withhold Futile Treatment.Glenn G. Griener - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):207-224.
Towards a Just, Courageous, and Honest Resolution of the Futility Debate.Rosemarie Tong - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):165-189.
Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care.Mary Ann Baily - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):172-182.
Autonomy and Futility.William H. Bruening - 1992 - HEC Forum 4 (5):305-313.
Just Dying: The Futility of Futility.J. Savulescu - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):583-584.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-03-21

Total downloads
49 ( #131,890 of 2,293,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,792 of 2,293,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature