Chronicle of Higher Education 1 (2011)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
An academic division of labor resulted from the distinction between sex and gender. Sex remained a productive topic (excuse the pun) for biologists, who are interested in the genetic, developmental, and chemical pathways of male/female dimorphism. People in the social sciences and humanities, by contrast, made gender, not sex, the subject of their work. In gender studies, we learn about the ways that men and women “perform” their respective roles—people of male sex can perform as female gender, and vice versa, by adopting modes of speech, dress, behavior, and even values. There is no talk of innate instincts or brain differences in gender studies.
The French philosopher Michel Foucault set the agenda when he lamented, as early as 1976, that “the notion of sex made it possible to group together, in an artificial unity, anatomical elements, biological functions, conducts, sensations, and pleasures, and it enabled one to make use of this fictitious unity as a causal principle.” Following this approach, more-recent theorists like Anne Fausto-Sterling and Judith Butler have argued that even the biological categories of sex are just artificial inventions, designed to keep women and intersexed peoples down. Society, they suggest, decides which of us are males and which are females—pushing everyone into rigid binary categories.
There are two main arguments that are usually offered in defense of this controversial thesis that sexual dimorphism is political rather than ontological. One is based on a general critique of knowledge (an epistemological argument), and the other on a specific picture of reality (a metaphysical argument). I will offer counterarguments to both.
|
Keywords | sex gender trans lgbtq homosexuality sexual identity identity masculinity femininity male female |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Interplay of Cultural Expectation, Gender Role, and Communicative Behavior : Evidence From Compliment-Responding Behavior.Chihsia Tang - 2020 - Pragmatics and Society 11 (4):545-569.
Artificial Ef-Femination: Female Bodybuilding and Gender Disruption.Marla Morton-Brown - 2004 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (1):27-34.
Gender Identity and Exclusion: A Reply to Jenkins.Matthew Salett Andler - 2017 - Ethics 127 (4):883-895.
Free Personal Development Through the Recognizing and Accepting of Gender Differences.N. O. Kodatska - 2015 - Granì 18 (2).
De-Sexing the Medical Record? An Examination of Sex Versus Gender Identity in the General Medical Council’s Trans Healthcare Ethical Advice.Sara Dahlen - 2020 - The New Bioethics 26 (1):38-52.
Something’s Got to Give: Reconsidering the Justification for a Gender Divide in Sport.Andria Bianchi - 2019 - Philosophies 4 (2):23-0.
Towards a Distinction Between Gender Identity and Gender Orientation.Avery Newman - 2020 - Georgia State University Master's Theses 2020.
Sex and Gender Through an Analytic Eye: Butler on Freud and Gender Identity.Anna Gullickson '00 - unknown
Phantom Penises in Transsexuals.V. S. Ramachandran & Paul D. McGeoch - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (1):5-16.
Gender Barriers to the Female Mentor – Male Protégé Relationship.Regina M. O'Neill & Stacy D. Blake-Beard - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):51 - 63.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-10-06
Total views
63 ( #181,381 of 2,506,349 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #63,784 of 2,506,349 )
2020-10-06
Total views
63 ( #181,381 of 2,506,349 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #63,784 of 2,506,349 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads