Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1 (1):1-23 (2016)
AbstractI show that there are good arguments and evidence to boot that support the language as an instrument of thought hypothesis. The underlying mechanisms of language, comprising of expressions structured hierarchically and recursively, provide a perspective (in the form of a conceptual structure) on the world, for it is only via language that certain perspectives are avail- able to us and to our thought processes. These mechanisms provide us with a uniquely human way of thinking and talking about the world that is different to the sort of thinking we share with other animals. If the primary function of language were communication then one would expect that the underlying mechanisms of language will be structured in a way that favours successful communication. I show that not only is this not the case, but that the underlying mechanisms of language are in fact structured in a way to maximise computational efficiency, even if it means causing communicative problems. Moreover, I discuss evidence from comparative, neuropatho- logical, developmental, and neuroscientific evidence that supports the claim that language is an instrument of thought.
Similar books and articles
Language is an Instrument for Thought. Really?Jan Nuyts - 2012 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (2):317-333.
Language, Thought, and Communication.Gilbert Harman - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:270-298.
On the Alleged Priority of Thought Over Language.Christopher Gauker - 2007 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press. pp. 125.
Language and Emotion From the Perspective of the Computational Belief-Desire Theory of Emotion.Rainer Reisenzein & Martin Junge - 2012 - In Emiliano Lorini & Andreas Herzig (eds.), Dynamicity in Emotion Concepts. Springer Verlag.
The Language-Thought Partnership: A Bird's Eye View.Ruth G. Millikan - 2001 - Language and Communication 21 (2):157-166.
Why is Thought Linguistic? Ockham's Two Conceptions of the Intellect.Martin Lenz - 2008 - Vivarium 46 (3):302-317.
Conceptual Dependency as the Language of Thought.Charles E. M. Dunlop - 1990 - Synthese 82 (2):275-96.
The Creative Aspect of Language Use and the Implications for Linguistic Science.Eran Asoulin - 2013 - Biolinguistics 7:228-248.
Internalizing Communication.Gerard O'Brien & Jon Opie - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):694-695.
From Thought to Language to Thought: Towards a Dialectical Picture of the Development of Thinking and Speaking.Hannes Rakoczy - 2010 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 81 (1):77-103.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Language and Scientific Explanation: Where Does Semantics Fit In?Eran Asoulin - 2020 - Berlin, Germany: Language Science Press.
Distinct Neural Processes for Memorizing Form and Meaning Within Sentences.Matteo Mascelloni, Roberto Zamparelli, Francesco Vespignani, Thomas Gruber & Jutta L. Mueller - 2019 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13.
Il linguaggio come collante tra menti individuali e socialità umana.Filippo Batisti - 2019 - In Gaia Bagnati, Alice Morelli & Melania Cassan (eds.), Le varietà del naturalismo. Venezia VE, Italia: Edizioni Ca' Focari. pp. 171-179.
Le varietà del naturalismo.Gaia Bagnati, Alice Morelli & Melania Cassan (eds.) - 2019 - Edizioni Ca' Foscari.