Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing

Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (5):310 (2001)

Summary Principles Timely support for patients and people close to them, and effective, sensitive communication are essential. Decisions must be based on the individual patient's circumstances and reviewed regularly. Sensitive advance discussion should always be encouraged, but not forced. Information about CPR and the chances of a successful outcome needs to be realistic. Practical matters Information about CPR policies should be displayed for patients and staff. Leaflets should be available for patients and people close to them explaining about CPR, how decisions are made and their involvement in decisions. Decisions about attempting CPR must be communicated effectively to relevant health professionals. In emergencies If no advance decision has been made or is known, CPR should be attempted unless: the patient has refused CPR; the patient is clearly in the terminal phase of illness; or the burdens of the treatment outweigh the benefits. Advance decision making Competent patients should be involved in discussions about attempting CPR unless they indicate that they do not want to be. Where patients lack competence to participate, people close to them can be helpful in reflecting their views. Legal issues Patients' rights under the Human Rights Act must be taken into account in decision making. Neither patients nor relatives can demand treatment which the health care team judges to be inappropriate, but all efforts will be made to accommodate wishes and preferences. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland relatives and people close to the patient are not entitled in law to take health care decisions for the patient. In Scotland, adults may appoint a health care proxy to give consent to medical treatment. Health professionals need to be aware of the law in relation to decision making for children and young people.IntroductionWhy policies are neededCardiopulmonary resuscitation can be attempted on any person whose cardiac or respiratory functions cease. Failure of these functions is part of dying and thus …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.27.5.310
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,330
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Witnessed Resuscitation: A Conceptual Exploration.Wendy Marina Walker - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Resuscitation and Senility: A Study of Patients' Opinions.G. S. Robertson - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (2):104-107.
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Elderly.K. Stewart, K. Cumming & A. Wagg - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (3):181-182.
Should the “Slow Code” Be Resuscitated?John D. Lantos & William L. Meadow - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11):8-12.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #210,948 of 2,291,076 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #183,708 of 2,291,076 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature