Techne 10 (1):16-29 (2006)
Technological developments often bring about new risks. Informed consent has been proposed as a means to legitimize the imposition of technological risks. This principle was first introduced in medical practice to assure the autonomy of the patient.The introduction of IC in the field of technological practice raises questions about the comparability of the type of informed consent. To what extent are thepossibilities to include laypeople in making decisions regarding risks similar in the technological field to giving informed consent in the medical field and whatdoes this imply for the design and implementation of IC in the technological field? Medical and the technological practice are clearly alike in that both fieldsare characterized by highly specialized, technical knowledge which can be quite inaccessible to the average layperson. However, a fundamental difference ariseswith regard to the aim, knowledge of risks and exclusiveness of the practices in each field. The differences in aim imply that the necessity for each practice isperceived differently by laypeople, thus leading them to assess the respective risks differently. The differences in knowledge of risks arise from the variabilityin the ways that can be used to describe a given risk. Definition of risk in medical practice is more homogenous in this respect than the risk definition intechnological fields. Futhermore, medical practice tends to be more exclusive, leading laypeople immersed in that practice to necessarily embrace most of thefundamental underlying that practice. These differences result in divergent recommendations for the implementation of informed consent in the technological field, basically: there is a need for more extensive procedure and for less decisive authority for the individual
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice.Deborah Bowman - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent.Jukka Varelius - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.
Expert and Non-Expert Knowledge in Medical Practice.Nordin Ingemar - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):295-302.
Medical Risk and the Right to an Informed Consent in Clinical Care and Clinical Research.Dennis John Mazur - 1998 - American College of Physician Executives.
A Confucian View of Personhood and Bioethics.Erika Yu & Ruiping Fan - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):171-179.
Informed Consent and the Disclosure of Risks of Treatment: The Supreme Court of Canada Decides. [REVIEW]Janice R. Dillon - 1981 - Bioethics Quarterly 3 (3-4):156-162.
Informed Consent, Autonomy, and the Law.David B. Annis - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:249-259.
Argumentation and Informed Consent in the Doctor–Patient Relationship.Jerome Bickenbach - 2012 - Journal of Argumentaion in Context 1 (1):5-18.
Observations of Physician, Patient and Family Perceptions of Informed Consent in Houston, Texas.Eugene V. Boisaubin - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):225 – 236.
Informed Consent Practices in Nigeria.Emmanuel R. Ezeome & Patricia A. Marshall - 2009 - Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):138-148.
Informed Consent for Research in Borderline Personality Disorder.Rachel E. Dew - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-4.
Respecting Autonomy Without Disclosing Information.Tom Walker - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (7):388-394.
A Commentary on 'Informed Consent to Septoplasty: An Anecdote From the Field'.Edmund Erde - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):18 – 27.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads26 ( #198,179 of 2,177,930 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,203 of 2,177,930 )
How can I increase my downloads?