Journal of Speculative Philosophy 20 (4):251 - 265 (2006)

When I cruise the forty-three television channels available to me (and that's basic cable), simultaneously being enchanted and disgusted by much that I see (a kind of Kantian sublime), I cannot help but think that the culture in which I find myself is less articulate than ever. For this situation perhaps the 43rd President of the United States could serve as a useful emblem—a joke that is all too easy to make. But such a diagnosis of the low standard of my culture's literacy might also be too easy to make. For it is the case that America's traditional anti-intellectualism reaches new heights in our current, hypermediated milieu: we now have more venues than ever to disseminate undisciplined, uncreative thought (think, for example, of all the burgeoning blogs). On the other hand, such hypermediation amounts to an explosion of symbolization. Language is everywhere, and hence there is the demand to use it instrumentally well. Again, an image from the U.S. presidency is emblematic. Think of President Clinton's infamous line to the intrepid Independent Counsel: "It depends on what your definition of the word 'is' is." Such a line could represent the pervasive urge to absolutely precise articulation, controlling one's words to an extreme degree. Another emblem could be the common academic paper where a writer has masterfully summarized and explained the words of another thinker, rendering them more accessible but probably not more desirable. One could read this situation dialectically: the moment when concern for the value of language seems lowest is also the moment when the demand for controlling language is highest. Beyond dialectics, however, I take the demand for absolute articulation as a jumping-off point for considering an idea that might appear to have nothing to do with this implicit yet persistent demand—the concept of presence. More specifically, I want to consider how a particular rendering of this concept affects what we might call the divine and its relationship to an ostensibly secular culture, and I also want to consider some lines from Emerson and how they can lead one to think of the divine as presence, a presence that requires an absence, a presence that to some extent is an absence. According to this encounter with Emerson, thinking about the presence and absence of the divine has to do with the way one takes up writing.
Keywords R.W. Emerson  Presence  Philosophy of culture
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/jspecphil.20.4.0251
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Fragments/Johannes Climacus.Howard V. Hong, Edna H. Hong & Søren Kierkegaard - 1987 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21 (2):115-116.
God, the Gift, and Postmodernism.John D. Caputo & Michael J. Scanlon - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (3):613-615.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Death as a Loss.Brian Sayers - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (2):149-159.
Philosophy and Personal Loss.Susan Dunston - 2010 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (2):158-170.
Death.James W. Evra - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).
Genocide and Social Death.Claudia Card - 2003 - Hypatia 18 (1):63-79.
Derrida and the Question of Presence.Françoise Dastur - 2006 - Research in Phenomenology 36 (1):45-62.


Added to PP index

Total views
494 ( #17,796 of 2,498,211 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,211 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes