Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence (forthcoming)
AbstractLegal positivists maintain that the legality of a rule is fundamentally determined by social facts. Yet for much of legal history, ordinary officials used legal terminology in ways that seem inconsistent with positivism. Judges regularly cited, analyzed, and predicated their decisions on the ‘laws of justice’ which they claimed had universal legal import. This practice, though well-documented by historians, has received surprisingly little philosophical attention; I argue that it invites explanation from positivists. After taxonomizing the positivist’s explanatory options, I suggest that the most viable option appeals to conceptual change: classical Romans, early modern Europeans, founding-era Americans were not using ‘law’ (or ‘lex’ or ‘jus’) to refer to the subject matter of contemporary legal philosophy. But the strategy is costly. It renders positivism’s truth surprisingly parochial. And it supplies new reasons for doubting positivist accounts of contemporary practices, including the treatment of moral principles in modern adjudication.
Similar books and articles
Charter Challenges: A Test Case For Theories of Law.Wilfrid J. Waluchow - 1991 - Osgoode Hall Law Journal 29 (1):183-214.
Legal positivism? What are you talking about? ('De quel positivisme parlez-vous?').Francois Chevrette & Hugo Cyr - unknown
The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism.Torben Spaak (ed.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
The place of legal positivism in contemporary constitutional states.Giorgio Pino - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):513-536.
Legal positivism: Still descriptive and morally neutral.Andrei Marmor - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4):683-704.
The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
The Legal Relation: Legal Theory after Legal Positivism.Alexander Somek - 2017 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Legal Theory: Legal Positivism and Conceptual Analysis: Proceedings of the 22nd Ivr World Congress, Granada 2005, Volume I = Teoría Del Derecho: Positivismo Jurídico y Análisis Conceptual. [REVIEW]Josep J. Moreso (ed.) - 2007 - Franz Steiner Verlag.
The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1996 - Oxford University Press UK.
Arguments against inclusive legal positivism.R. Escudero Alday - 2007 - In Josep J. Moreso (ed.), Legal Theory: Legal Positivism and Conceptual Analysis: Proceedings of the 22nd Ivr World Congress, Granada 2005, Volume I = Teoría Del Derecho: Positivismo Jurídico y Análisis Conceptual. Franz Steiner Verlag.
On relationships between the logic of law, legal positivism and semiotics of law.Vadim Verenich - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4):145-195.
One Myth of the Classical Natural Law Theory: Reflecting on the “Thin” View of Legal Positivism.Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco & Pilar Zambrano - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (1):9-32.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
The Folk Concept of Law: Law Is Intrinsically Moral.Brian Flanagan & Ivar R. Hannikainen - 2022 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100 (1):165-179.
How to be an uncompromising revisionary ontologist.David Mark Kovacs - 2019 - Synthese 198 (3):2129-2152.
Semantic Deference versus Semantic Coordination.Laura Schroeter & François Schroeter - 2016 - American Philosophical Quarterly 53 (2):193-210.