Are Big Gods a big deal in the emergence of big groups?

Religion, Brain and Behavior 5 (4):266-274 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Big Gods, Norenzayan (2013) presents the most comprehensive treatment yet of the Big Gods question. The book is a commendable attempt to synthesize the rapidly growing body of survey and experimental research on prosocial effects of religious primes together with cross-cultural data on the distribution of Big Gods. There are, however, a number of problems with the current cross-cultural evidence that weaken support for a causal link between big societies and certain types of Big Gods. Here we attempt to clarify these problems and, in so doing, correct any potential misinterpretation of the cross-cultural findings, provide new insight into the processes generating the patterns observed, and flag directions for future research.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict.James A. Van Slyke - 2015 - Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences 2 (1):124.
Big Gods: Extended prosociality or group binding?Luke W. Galen - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-13

Downloads
1,172 (#16,454)

6 months
214 (#14,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew James Latham
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

From Proto-Forgiveness to Minimal Forgiveness.Andrew James Latham & Kristie Miller - 2019 - Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (3):330-335.
Modelling Religious Signalling.Carl Brusse - 2019 - Dissertation, Australian National University
The Dead May Kill You.Claire White, Maya Marin & Daniel M. T. Fessler - 2022 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 22 (3-4):294-323.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references