Getting Gettier Right: Reply to Mizrahi

Logos and Episteme 8 (3):347-357 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moti Mizrahi has argued that Gettier cases are misleading, since they involve a certain kind of semantic failure. In a recent paper, I criticized Mizrahi’s argument. Mizrahi has since responded. This is a response to his response.

Similar books and articles

Gettier Unscathed for Now.John C. Duff - 2022 - Logos and Episteme 13 (3):317-323.
Are Gettier Cases Misleading?Philip Atkins - 2016 - Logos and Episteme 7 (3):379-384.
Knowledge, Certainty, and Factivity.Jeffrey Hoops - 2020 - Logos and Episteme 11 (2):237-243.
Factivity or Grounds? Comment on Mizrahi.Howard Sankey - 2019 - Logos and Episteme 10 (3):333-4.
Knowledge Doesn’t Require Epistemic Certainty.James Simpson - 2019 - Logos and Episteme 10 (4):449-450.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-16

Downloads
267 (#80,105)

6 months
56 (#96,332)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Atkins
Temple University