Hume on "is" and "ought": A reply to mr. Macintyre

Philosophical Review 70 (2):231-238 (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to mr. Nelson.Manley Thompson - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (3):414-419.
A reply to mr. Taylor.Frederick A. Olafson - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (3):373-379.
A reply to mr. Sellars.P. F. Strawson - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (2):216-231.
Hume on "is" and "ought".A. C. MacIntyre - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (4):451-468.
Postscript to the third man: A reply to mr. Geach.Gregory Vlastos - 1956 - Philosophical Review 65 (1):83-94.
Superadded properties: A reply to M. R. Ayers.Margaret D. Wilson - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (2):247-252.
Mr. Whitehead's philosophy.Merritt Hadden Moore - 1931 - Philosophical Review 40 (3):265-275.
Rejoinder to mr. Lepley.DeWitt H. Parker - 1946 - Philosophical Review 55 (3):288-291.
Mr. Rieser on architecture.Russell L. Ackoff - 1947 - Philosophical Review 56 (6):690-694.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
226 (#92,883)

6 months
13 (#219,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Identity of the History of Ideas.John Dunn - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (164):85 - 104.
Laying Down Hume's Law.Hsueh Qu - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (1):24-46.
Attitudes and Normativity.Tadeusz Ciecierski - 2017 - Axiomathes 27 (3):265-283.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references