Abstract
A Zenonian supertask involving an infinite number of colliding balls is considered, under the restriction that the total mass of all the balls is finite. Classical mechanics leads to the conclusion that momentum, but not necessarily energy, must be conserved. Relativistic mechanics, on the other hand, implies that energy and momentum conservation are always violated. Quantum mechanics, however, seems to rule out the Zeno configuration as an inconsistent system.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.06.002
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Supertasks.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Achilles, the Tortoise, and Colliding Balls.Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2008 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (3):187 - 201.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Losing Energy in Classical, Relativistic and Quantum Mechanics.David Atkinson - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (1):170-180.
Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory.F. Strocchi - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (3):501-527.
Geometrizing Relativistic Quantum Mechanics.F. T. Falciano, M. Novello & J. M. Salim - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (12):1885-1901.
On the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics.Valia Allori & Nino Zanghi - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 10.1007/S10701-008-9259-4 39 (1):20-32.
Logical Anomalies of Quantum Objects. A Survey.G. Peruzzi - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (3):337-352.
Quantum Tunneling Time: Relativistic Extensions. [REVIEW]Dai-Yu Xu, Towe Wang & Xun Xue - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (11):1257-1274.
Why Quantum Mechanics?P. T. Landsberg - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (10):969-982.
Why Quantum Mechanics Indeed?A. Granik - 1997 - Foundations of Physics 27 (4):511-532.
Quantum Potential in Relativistic Dynamics.John R. Fanchi - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (8):1161-1189.
What is a Wavefunction.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2015 - Synthese 192 (10):3247-3274.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
261 ( #41,658 of 2,506,101 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,711 of 2,506,101 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes