Biocentric Consequentialism, Pluralism, and ‘The Minimax Implication’: A Reply to Alan Carter: Robin Attfield

Utilitas 15 (1):76-91 (2003)

Authors
Abstract
Alan Carter's recent review in Mind of my Ethics of the Global Environment combines praise of biocentric consequentialism with criticisms that it could advocate both minimal satisfaction of human needs and the extinction of ‘inessential species’ for the sake of generating extra people; Carter also maintains that as a monistic theory it is predictably inadequate to cover the full range of ethical issues, since only a pluralistic theory has this capacity. In this reply, I explain how the counter-intuitive implications of biocentric consequentialism suggested by Carter are not implications, and argue that since pluralistic theories either generate contradictions or collapse into monistic theories, the superiority of pluralistic theories is far from predictable. Thus Carter's criticisms fail to undermine biocentric consequentialism as a normative theory applicable to the generality of ethical issues.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820800003782
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Overpopulation and the Quality of Life.Derek Parfit - 1986 - In Peter Singer (ed.), Applied Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 145-164.
The Case Against Moral Pluralism.J. Baird Callicott - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (2):99-124.
A Refutation of Environmental Ethics.Janna Thompson - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (2):147-160.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

From Biocentric Individualism to Biocentric Pluralism.James P. Sterba - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (2):191-207.
From Biocentric Individualism to Biocentric Pluralism.James P. Sterba - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (2):191-207.
The Shape of a Global Ethic.Robin Attfield - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (1):5-19.
Attfield and Animals: Capacities and Relations in Attfield's Environmental Ethics.Clare Palmer - 2011 - In Rebekah Humphries & Sophie Vlacos (eds.), Creation, Environment and Ethics. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 105-120.
Consequentialism and Decision Procedures.Toby Ord - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Oxford
The Prospects of a Viable Biocentric Egalitarianism.Karánn Durland - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (4):401-416.
Consequentialism.Julia Driver - 2011 - Routledge.
In Defense of Biocentrism.Paul W. Taylor - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (3):237-243.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
147 ( #50,735 of 2,260,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #165,365 of 2,260,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature