Is the Concept of Nature Dispensable?

Abstract
In response to the arguments of Bill McKibben and of Stephen Vogel that nature is at an end and that the very concept of nature should be discarded, I argue that, far from this being the case, the concept of nature is indispensable. A third sense of 'nature' besides the two distinguished by Vogel, that of the nature of an organism, is brought to attention and shown, through five arguments, to be indispensable for environmental philosophy and ethics, and for ethics in general (veterinary and medical ethics included). But it is no coincidence that the same term is used for all three senses of'nature' in many languages. The indispensability of 'nature' in the third sense is used to suggest the indispensability of 'nature' in the second sense (things unaffected by human activity, a sense needed if we are to understand species whether wild or domesticated, because of their evolutionary history, and if we are to distinguish social systems from natural systems), and also of 'nature' in the first sense (things that are not supernatural, a sense needed if we are to ask metaphysical questions about whether 'nature' in this sense and in the other two might have a creator)
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/wcp2120075210
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,205
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Can and Ought We to Follow Nature? Rolston - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (1):7-30.
Can and Ought We to Follow Nature?Holmes Rolston Iii - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (1):7-30.
The Concept of Nature and Historicism in Marx.Zhang Wenxi - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):630-642.
Environmental Philosophy After the End of Nature.Steven Vogel - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (1):23-39.
Appreciating Nature on its Own Terms.Yuriko Saito - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (2):135-149.
Toward a Practical Philosophy of Nature.Klaus M. Meyer-Abich - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (4):293-308.
The Nature of Artifacts.Steven Vogel - 2003 - Environmental Ethics 25 (2):149-168.
The Finitude of Nature: Rethinking the Ethics of Biotechnology.Helen A. Fielding - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):327-334.
Human Nature in a Post-Essentialist World.Grant Ramsey - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):983-993.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-02

Total downloads

62 ( #82,407 of 2,154,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

16 ( #28,316 of 2,154,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums