Intuition, Inference, and Rational Disagreement in Ethics

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (5):475-492 (2008)

Robert N. Audi
University of Notre Dame
This paper defends a moderate intuitionism by extending a version of that view previously put forward and responding to some significant objections to it that have been posed in recent years. The notion of intuition is clarified, and various kinds of intuition are distinguished and interconnected. These include doxastic intuitions and intuitive seemings. The concept of inference is also clarified. In that light, the possibility of non-inferential intuitive justification is explained in relation to both singular moral judgments, which intuitionists do not take to be self-evident, and basic moral principles, which they typically do take to be self-evident in a sense explicated in the paper. This explanation is accomplished in part by drawing some analogies between moral and perceptual judgments in the light of a developmental conception of knowledge. The final section of the paper presents a partial account of rational disagreement and indicates how the kind of intuitionist view defended can allow for rational disagreement between apparent epistemic peers.
Keywords Philosophy   Ontology   Political Philosophy   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-008-9123-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,780
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethical Intuitionism.Michael Huemer - 2005 - Palgrave Macmillan.
Moral Reasons.Jonathan Dancy - 1993 - Blackwell.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Intuitionism and Disagreement.Brian Besong - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2767-2789.
Why Nearly Everything Is Knowable A Priori.Brian Cutter - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Intuitive Non-Naturalism Meets Cosmic Coincidence.Matthew S. Bedke - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):188-209.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Function, Intuition and Ends in Aristotle's Ethics.Roopen N. Majithia - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):187-200.
Virtue and Disagreement.Bridget Clarke - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):273-291.
The Concept of Political Judgment.Peter J. Steinberger - 1993 - University of Chicago Press.
Is Genuine Satisficing Rational?Edmund Henden - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):339-352.
Toward Understanding Reasoned Resolution of Disagreement.Don Fawkes - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):56-62.
On Explaining Political Disagreement.Andrew Mason - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
The Faculty of Intuition.Steven D. Hales - 2012 - Analytic Philosophy 53 (2):180-207.
Legislation, Law and Ethics.Adela Cortina - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):3-7.
Eight Theories of Ethics.Sorcha Uí Chonnachtaigh - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (1):105-107.
An Introduction to Business Ethics.Julie Ragatz - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):243-245.
N. Zack, Ethics for Disaster.Dale Murray - 2011 - Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (2):229-232.


Added to PP index

Total views
773 ( #3,976 of 2,264,853 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #120,453 of 2,264,853 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature